{
  "schema_version": 1,
  "benchmark_id": "clawmont-runtime-security-2026-07-10",
  "product": "Clawmont Guardrails",
  "publisher": "Clawmont",
  "published_at": "2026-07-10",
  "source_document": "https://clawmont.com/security/#measured-rates",
  "methodology": "Aggregate outcomes from a fixed-corpus harness and a separate fresh-corpus deterministic-rail evaluation.",
  "measurements": {
    "fixed_corpus": {
      "measurement_date": "2026-06-10",
      "corpus_type": "fixed adversarial corpus",
      "detection_scope": "deterministic checks represented by the fixed-corpus harness",
      "corpus_size": 2324,
      "blocked_count": 1829,
      "known_miss_count": 495,
      "detection_rate": 0.787,
      "false_positive_count": 0,
      "clean_negative_count": 62,
      "unexpected_bypass_count": 0
    },
    "novel_attacks": {
      "measurement_date": "2026-06-17",
      "corpus_type": "fresh unseen plain-English attacks",
      "corpus_label": "R4",
      "detection_scope": "deterministic rail only",
      "attack_count": 3120,
      "blocked_count": 1033,
      "detection_rate": 0.3311
    }
  },
  "caveat": "The 78.7% result comes from a fixed corpus the detectors were iterated against, so it overstates performance on attacks they have never seen. Fresh, unseen plain-English attacks measured 33.11% on the deterministic checks only. These are best-effort test outcomes, not a guarantee."
}